Skip to content
AI Tier ListField guide

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash

Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ranks #1 overall — ahead of inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash at #37. inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.01/1M vs $0.14/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers the larger context window at 1M tokens.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash: which should you use?

Choose DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…

  • It sees more real traffic — #1 overall on OpenRouter's weekly ranking, against #37 for inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash.
  • Bigger context window — 1M vs 262K tokens.
  • Higher Artificial Analysis intelligence index — 51.8 vs 14.2.
  • Higher Artificial Analysis coding score — 69.1 vs 25.3.
  • Higher Artificial Analysis agentic score — 48.4 vs 2.3.
  • It is the newer model — released Jul 2026 against Apr 2026.

Choose inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash if…

  • Cheaper to read — $0.01 vs $0.14 per 1M input tokens, which is what dominates long-prompt and RAG workloads.
  • Cheaper to write — $0.03 vs $0.28 per 1M output tokens, the line item that decides generation-heavy costs.

Spec Comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash
Authordeepseekinclusionai
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.14$0.01
Output price (per 1M tokens)$0.28$0.03
Context window1M262K
Input modalitiestexttext
Output modalitiestexttext
AA Intelligence51.814.2
AA Coding69.125.3
AA Agentic48.42.3
ReleasedJul 2026Apr 2026

What DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash actually cost to run

On a read-heavy job — 1M tokens in, 100K out — DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.17 and inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash costs $0.01.

Flip the shape — 100K in, 1M out — and it becomes $0.29 for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 versus $0.03 for inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash.

Both figures are the published per-token rates multiplied out; caching and batch discounts are not included.

Usage Rank by Task

About DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Built by deepseek · released Jul 2026 · 1M-token context

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is a sparse mixture-of-experts model from DeepSeek, with 13B active parameters out of 284B total. This re-post-trained revision is suited for coding, reasoning, and agent workflows....

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash

Built by inclusionai · released Apr 2026 · 262K-token context

Ling-2.6-flash is an instant (instruct) model from inclusionAI with 104B total parameters and 7.4B active parameters, designed for real-world agents that require fast responses, strong execution, and high token efficiency....

Share this comparisonXReddit

Get notified when DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash moves

Usage ranks and prices refresh weekly. We email you when they move — once a week, no spam.

FAQ

Which is better, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash?

Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ranks #1 overall — ahead of inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash at #37. inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.01/1M vs $0.14/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash?

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash is cheaper at $0.01 per 1M input tokens. Output pricing: DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 $0.28, inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash $0.03.

Usage ranks are weekly data aggregated by OpenRouter. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.