Skip to content
AI Tier ListField guide

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs Tencent: Hy3

Week of · usage ranks & prices refresh weekly

Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, Tencent: Hy3 ranks #2 overall — ahead of inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash at #37. inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.01/1M vs $0.13/1M for Tencent: Hy3.

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs Tencent: Hy3: which should you use?

Choose inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash if…

  • Cheaper to read — $0.01 vs $0.13 per 1M input tokens, which is what dominates long-prompt and RAG workloads.
  • Cheaper to write — $0.03 vs $0.53 per 1M output tokens, the line item that decides generation-heavy costs.

Choose Tencent: Hy3 if…

  • It sees more real traffic — #2 overall on OpenRouter's weekly ranking, against #37 for inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash.
  • It is the newer model — released Jul 2026 against Apr 2026.

Spec Comparison

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs Tencent: Hy3: price, context window, modalities and benchmark specs
SpecinclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flashTencent: Hy3
Authorinclusionaitencent
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.01$0.13
Output price (per 1M tokens)$0.03$0.53
Context window262K262K
Input modalitiestexttext
Output modalitiestexttext
AA Intelligence14.2
AA Coding25.3
AA Agentic2.3
ReleasedApr 2026Jul 2026

What inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash and Tencent: Hy3 actually cost to run

On a read-heavy job — 1M tokens in, 100K out — inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash costs $0.01 and Tencent: Hy3 costs $0.18.

Flip the shape — 100K in, 1M out — and it becomes $0.03 for inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash versus $0.54 for Tencent: Hy3.

Both figures are the published per-token rates multiplied out; caching and batch discounts are not included.

Usage Rank by Task

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs Tencent: Hy3: weekly OpenRouter usage rank by task
TaskinclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flashTencent: Hy3
Overall#37#2
Memory Extraction#3
Multi-step Planning#3
Tool Dispatch#3
Web Search#3
Agent Workflows#1
Classification & Tagging#10
Debugging#9
DevOps Config#7
File Read/Write#2
Frontend UI#6
Code Implementation#4
Repo Analysis#2
Code Review & Security#8
Shell Execution#4

About inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash and Tencent: Hy3

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash

Built by inclusionai · released Apr 2026 · 262K-token context

Ling-2.6-flash is an instant (instruct) model from inclusionAI with 104B total parameters and 7.4B active parameters, designed for real-world agents that require fast responses, strong execution, and high token efficiency....

Tencent: Hy3

Built by tencent · released Jul 2026 · 262K-token context

Hy3 is a 295B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent (21B active, 192 experts with top-8 routing) built for reasoning, agentic workflows, and real-world production use. It supports a configurable reasoning effort:...

Related comparisons

Share this comparisonXReddit

Get notified when inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash or Tencent: Hy3 moves

Usage ranks and prices refresh weekly. We email you when they move — once a week, no spam.

FAQ

Which is better, inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash or Tencent: Hy3?

Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, Tencent: Hy3 ranks #2 overall — ahead of inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash at #37. inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash is cheaper on input tokens at $0.01/1M vs $0.13/1M for Tencent: Hy3.

Which is cheaper, inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash or Tencent: Hy3?

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash is cheaper at $0.01 per 1M input tokens. Output pricing: inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash $0.03, Tencent: Hy3 $0.53.

Is Tencent: Hy3 still ahead of inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash right now?

Yes. For the week of 2026-08-10, Tencent: Hy3 ranks #2 overall on OpenRouter usage against #37 for inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash. Ranks refresh weekly, and the verdict on this page flips if they cross.

Usage ranks are weekly data aggregated by OpenRouter. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.