Skip to content
AI Tier ListField guide

Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch)

Week of · usage ranks & prices refresh weekly

Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, Tencent: Hy3 ranks #2 overall — ahead of Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) at #6. Tencent: Hy3 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.13/1M vs $0.70/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch). Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) offers the larger context window at 512K tokens.

Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch): which should you use?

Choose Tencent: Hy3 if…

  • It sees more real traffic — #2 overall on OpenRouter's weekly ranking, against #6 for Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch).
  • Cheaper to read — $0.13 vs $0.70 per 1M input tokens, which is what dominates long-prompt and RAG workloads.
  • Cheaper to write — $0.53 vs $2.20 per 1M output tokens, the line item that decides generation-heavy costs.
  • It is the newer model — released Jul 2026 against Jun 2026.

Choose Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) if…

  • Bigger context window — 512K vs 262K tokens.

Spec Comparison

Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch): price, context window, modalities and benchmark specs
SpecTencent: Hy3Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch)
Authortencentz-ai
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.13$0.70
Output price (per 1M tokens)$0.53$2.20
Context window262K512K
Input modalitiestexttext
Output modalitiestexttext
AA Intelligence
AA Coding
AA Agentic
ReleasedJul 2026Jun 2026

What Tencent: Hy3 and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) actually cost to run

On a read-heavy job — 1M tokens in, 100K out — Tencent: Hy3 costs $0.18 and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) costs $0.92.

Flip the shape — 100K in, 1M out — and it becomes $0.54 for Tencent: Hy3 versus $2.27 for Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch).

Both figures are the published per-token rates multiplied out; caching and batch discounts are not included.

Usage Rank by Task

Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch): weekly OpenRouter usage rank by task
TaskTencent: Hy3Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch)
Overall#2#6
Memory Extraction#3#7
Multi-step Planning#3#5
Tool Dispatch#3#5
Web Search#3#6
Agent Workflows#1#4
Classification & Tagging#10
Debugging#9#2
DevOps Config#7#3
File Read/Write#2#5
Frontend UI#6#3
Code Implementation#4#2
Repo Analysis#2#7
Code Review & Security#8#1
Shell Execution#4#5

About Tencent: Hy3 and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch)

Tencent: Hy3

Built by tencent · released Jul 2026 · 262K-token context

Hy3 is a 295B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model from Tencent (21B active, 192 experts with top-8 routing) built for reasoning, agentic workflows, and real-world production use. It supports a configurable reasoning effort:...

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch)

Built by z-ai · released Jun 2026 · 512K-token context

GLM 5.2 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai. It supports text input and output with a 1M-token context window, and is suited for long-horizon agent workflows, project-level software engineering,...

Related comparisons

Share this comparisonXReddit

Get notified when Tencent: Hy3 or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) moves

Usage ranks and prices refresh weekly. We email you when they move — once a week, no spam.

FAQ

Which is better, Tencent: Hy3 or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch)?

Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, Tencent: Hy3 ranks #2 overall — ahead of Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) at #6. Tencent: Hy3 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.13/1M vs $0.70/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch). Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) offers the larger context window at 512K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Tencent: Hy3 or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch)?

Tencent: Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 per 1M input tokens. Output pricing: Tencent: Hy3 $0.53, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) $2.20.

Which is better for coding, Tencent: Hy3 or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch)?

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch). Best coding-task usage rank this week: Tencent: Hy3 #2, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) #1.

Is Tencent: Hy3 still ahead of Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch) right now?

Yes. For the week of 2026-08-10, Tencent: Hy3 ranks #2 overall on OpenRouter usage against #6 for Z.ai: GLM 5.2 (batch). Ranks refresh weekly, and the verdict on this page flips if they cross.

Usage ranks are weekly data aggregated by OpenRouter. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.