Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro
Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro ranks #7 overall — ahead of Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) at #15. Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) is cheaper on input tokens at $1/1M vs $1.17/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro offers the larger context window at 1M tokens.
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro: which should you use?
Choose Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) if…
- Cheaper to read — $1 vs $1.17 per 1M input tokens, which is what dominates long-prompt and RAG workloads.
- It accepts image, file input, which DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro does not.
- It is the newer model — released Jun 2026 against Apr 2026.
Choose DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro if…
- It sees more real traffic — #7 overall on OpenRouter's weekly ranking, against #15 for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch).
- Cheaper to write — $2.34 vs $5 per 1M output tokens, the line item that decides generation-heavy costs.
- Bigger context window — 1M vs 1M tokens.
Spec Comparison
| Spec | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Author | anthropic | deepseek |
| Input price (per 1M tokens) | $1 | $1.17 |
| Output price (per 1M tokens) | $5 | $2.34 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| AA Intelligence | — | 45.3 |
| AA Coding | — | 59.4 |
| AA Agentic | — | 37.8 |
| Released | Jun 2026 | Apr 2026 |
What Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro actually cost to run
On a read-heavy job — 1M tokens in, 100K out — Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) costs $1.50 and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.40.
Flip the shape — 100K in, 1M out — and it becomes $5.10 for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) versus $2.45 for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro.
Both figures are the published per-token rates multiplied out; caching and batch discounts are not included.
Usage Rank by Task
| Task | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | #15 | #7 |
| Memory Extraction | — | #8 |
| Multi-step Planning | — | #7 |
| Tool Dispatch | — | #8 |
| Web Search | — | #5 |
| Agent Workflows | — | #6 |
| Classification & Tagging | — | #10 |
| Debugging | — | #5 |
| DevOps Config | — | #8 |
| File Read/Write | — | #9 |
| Frontend UI | — | #9 |
| Code Implementation | — | #8 |
| Repo Analysis | — | #8 |
| Code Review & Security | — | #10 |
| Shell Execution | — | #1 |
About Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)
Built by anthropic · released Jun 2026 · 1M-token context
Sonnet 5 is Anthropic's most capable Sonnet-class model, with frontier performance across coding, agents, and professional work. It supports adaptive thinking with selectable reasoning effort levels (low, medium, high, max,...
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro
Built by deepseek · released Apr 2026 · 1M-token context
DeepSeek V4 Pro is a large-scale Mixture-of-Experts model from DeepSeek with 1.6T total parameters and 49B activated parameters, supporting a 1M-token context window. It is designed for advanced reasoning, coding,...
Related comparisons
- Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
- Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Tencent: Hy3
- Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Tencent: Hy3
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)
Get notified when Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro moves
Usage ranks and prices refresh weekly. We email you when they move — once a week, no spam.
FAQ
Which is better, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro?
Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro ranks #7 overall — ahead of Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) at #15. Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) is cheaper on input tokens at $1/1M vs $1.17/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro offers the larger context window at 1M tokens.
Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro?
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) is cheaper at $1 per 1M input tokens. Output pricing: Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) $5, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro $2.34.
Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro still ahead of Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) right now?
Yes. For the week of 2026-08-10, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro ranks #7 overall on OpenRouter usage against #15 for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch). Ranks refresh weekly, and the verdict on this page flips if they cross.
Usage ranks are weekly data aggregated by OpenRouter. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.