Skip to content
AI Tier ListField guide

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ranks #1 overall — ahead of Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) at #18. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.14/1M vs $1.50/1M for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch). DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: which should you use?

Choose Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) if…

  • It accepts image, file input, which DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 does not.

Choose DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…

  • It sees more real traffic — #1 overall on OpenRouter's weekly ranking, against #18 for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch).
  • Cheaper to read — $0.14 vs $1.50 per 1M input tokens, which is what dominates long-prompt and RAG workloads.
  • Cheaper to write — $0.28 vs $7.50 per 1M output tokens, the line item that decides generation-heavy costs.
  • Bigger context window — 1M vs 1M tokens.
  • Higher Artificial Analysis intelligence index — 51.8 vs 48.4.
  • Higher Artificial Analysis coding score — 69.1 vs 63.0.
  • Higher Artificial Analysis agentic score — 48.4 vs 42.1.
  • It is the newer model — released Jul 2026 against Feb 2026.

Spec Comparison

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Authoranthropicdeepseek
Input price (per 1M tokens)$1.50$0.14
Output price (per 1M tokens)$7.50$0.28
Context window1M1M
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Output modalitiestexttext
AA Intelligence48.451.8
AA Coding63.069.1
AA Agentic42.148.4
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2026

What Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 actually cost to run

On a read-heavy job — 1M tokens in, 100K out — Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) costs $2.25 and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.17.

Flip the shape — 100K in, 1M out — and it becomes $7.65 for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) versus $0.29 for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731.

Both figures are the published per-token rates multiplied out; caching and batch discounts are not included.

Usage Rank by Task

About Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)

Built by anthropic · released Feb 2026 · 1M-token context

Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's most capable Sonnet-class model yet, with frontier performance across coding, agents, and professional work. It excels at iterative development, complex codebase navigation, end-to-end project management with...

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Built by deepseek · released Jul 2026 · 1M-token context

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is a sparse mixture-of-experts model from DeepSeek, with 13B active parameters out of 284B total. This re-post-trained revision is suited for coding, reasoning, and agent workflows....

Share this comparisonXReddit

Get notified when Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 moves

Usage ranks and prices refresh weekly. We email you when they move — once a week, no spam.

FAQ

Which is better, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?

Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ranks #1 overall — ahead of Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) at #18. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.14/1M vs $1.50/1M for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch). DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper at $0.14 per 1M input tokens. Output pricing: Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) $7.50, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 $0.28.

Usage ranks are weekly data aggregated by OpenRouter. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.