Skip to content
AI Tier ListField guide

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

Week of · usage ranks & prices refresh weekly

Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 ranks #4 overall — ahead of Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) at #18. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.14/1M vs $1.50/1M for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch). DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 offers the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423: which should you use?

Choose Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) if…

  • Higher Artificial Analysis agentic score — 42.1 vs 31.1.
  • It accepts image, file input, which DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 does not.

Choose DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 if…

  • It sees more real traffic — #4 overall on OpenRouter's weekly ranking, against #18 for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch).
  • Cheaper to read — $0.14 vs $1.50 per 1M input tokens, which is what dominates long-prompt and RAG workloads.
  • Cheaper to write — $0.28 vs $7.50 per 1M output tokens, the line item that decides generation-heavy costs.
  • Bigger context window — 1M vs 1M tokens.
  • It is the newer model — released Apr 2026 against Feb 2026.

Spec Comparison

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423: price, context window, modalities and benchmark specs
SpecAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Authoranthropicdeepseek
Input price (per 1M tokens)$1.50$0.14
Output price (per 1M tokens)$7.50$0.28
Context window1M1M
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext
Output modalitiestexttext
AA Intelligence48.4
AA Coding63.0
AA Agentic42.131.1
ReleasedFeb 2026Apr 2026

What Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 actually cost to run

On a read-heavy job — 1M tokens in, 100K out — Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) costs $2.25 and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs $0.17.

Flip the shape — 100K in, 1M out — and it becomes $7.65 for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) versus $0.29 for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423.

Both figures are the published per-token rates multiplied out; caching and batch discounts are not included.

Usage Rank by Task

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423: weekly OpenRouter usage rank by task
TaskAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Overall#18#4
Memory Extraction#2
Multi-step Planning#1
Tool Dispatch#1
Web Search#1
Agent Workflows#3
Classification & Tagging#1
Debugging#4
DevOps Config#5
File Read/Write#4
Frontend UI#4
Code Implementation#6
Repo Analysis#4
Code Review & Security#4
Shell Execution#7

About Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)

Built by anthropic · released Feb 2026 · 1M-token context

Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's most capable Sonnet-class model yet, with frontier performance across coding, agents, and professional work. It excels at iterative development, complex codebase navigation, end-to-end project management with...

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

Built by deepseek · released Apr 2026 · 1M-token context

DeepSeek V4 Flash is an efficiency-optimized Mixture-of-Experts model from DeepSeek with 284B total parameters and 13B activated parameters, supporting a 1M-token context window. It is designed for fast inference and...

Related comparisons

Share this comparisonXReddit

Get notified when Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 moves

Usage ranks and prices refresh weekly. We email you when they move — once a week, no spam.

FAQ

Which is better, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423?

Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 ranks #4 overall — ahead of Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) at #18. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.14/1M vs $1.50/1M for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch). DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 offers the larger context window at 1M tokens.

Which is cheaper, Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is cheaper at $0.14 per 1M input tokens. Output pricing: Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) $7.50, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 $0.28.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 still ahead of Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) right now?

Yes. For the week of 2026-08-10, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 ranks #4 overall on OpenRouter usage against #18 for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch). Ranks refresh weekly, and the verdict on this page flips if they cross.

Usage ranks are weekly data aggregated by OpenRouter. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.