DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ranks #1 overall — ahead of MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 at #46. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.14/1M vs $0.57/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers the larger context window at 1M tokens.
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: which should you use?
Choose DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
- It sees more real traffic — #1 overall on OpenRouter's weekly ranking, against #46 for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5.
- Cheaper to read — $0.14 vs $0.57 per 1M input tokens, which is what dominates long-prompt and RAG workloads.
- Cheaper to write — $0.28 vs $2.85 per 1M output tokens, the line item that decides generation-heavy costs.
- Bigger context window — 1M vs 262K tokens.
- Higher Artificial Analysis intelligence index — 51.8 vs 36.0.
- Higher Artificial Analysis coding score — 69.1 vs 46.8.
- Higher Artificial Analysis agentic score — 48.4 vs 21.7.
- It is the newer model — released Jul 2026 against Jan 2026.
Choose MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 if…
- It accepts image input, which DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 does not.
Spec Comparison
| Spec | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Author | deepseek | moonshotai |
| Input price (per 1M tokens) | $0.14 | $0.57 |
| Output price (per 1M tokens) | $0.28 | $2.85 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Input modalities | text | text, image |
| Output modalities | text | text |
| AA Intelligence | 51.8 | 36.0 |
| AA Coding | 69.1 | 46.8 |
| AA Agentic | 48.4 | 21.7 |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Jan 2026 |
What DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 actually cost to run
On a read-heavy job — 1M tokens in, 100K out — DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.17 and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 costs $0.86.
Flip the shape — 100K in, 1M out — and it becomes $0.29 for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 versus $2.91 for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5.
Both figures are the published per-token rates multiplied out; caching and batch discounts are not included.
Usage Rank by Task
| Task | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | #1 | #46 |
| Memory Extraction | #6 | — |
| Multi-step Planning | #2 | — |
| Tool Dispatch | #2 | — |
| Web Search | #4 | — |
| Agent Workflows | #5 | — |
| Classification & Tagging | #9 | — |
| Debugging | #3 | — |
| DevOps Config | #2 | — |
| File Read/Write | #3 | — |
| Frontend UI | #2 | — |
| Code Implementation | #3 | — |
| Repo Analysis | #3 | — |
| Code Review & Security | #3 | — |
| Shell Execution | #6 | — |
About DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Built by deepseek · released Jul 2026 · 1M-token context
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is a sparse mixture-of-experts model from DeepSeek, with 13B active parameters out of 284B total. This re-post-trained revision is suited for coding, reasoning, and agent workflows....
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
Built by moonshotai · released Jan 2026 · 262K-token context
Kimi K2.5 is Moonshot AI's native multimodal model, delivering state-of-the-art visual coding capability and a self-directed agent swarm paradigm. Built on Kimi K2 with continued pretraining over approximately 15T mixed...
Related comparisons
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Tencent: Hy3
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
- MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Tencent: Hy3
- MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)
- MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Get notified when DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 moves
Usage ranks and prices refresh weekly. We email you when they move — once a week, no spam.
FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5?
Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ranks #1 overall — ahead of MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 at #46. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on input tokens at $0.14/1M vs $0.57/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 offers the larger context window at 1M tokens.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper at $0.14 per 1M input tokens. Output pricing: DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 $0.28, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 $2.85.
Which is better for coding, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731. Artificial Analysis coding scores: DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 69.1, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 46.8. Best coding-task usage rank this week: DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 #2, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 —.
Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 still ahead of MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 right now?
Yes. For the week of 2026-08-10, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ranks #1 overall on OpenRouter usage against #46 for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5. Ranks refresh weekly, and the verdict on this page flips if they cross.
Usage ranks are weekly data aggregated by OpenRouter. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.