Skip to content
AI Tier ListField guide

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch)

Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ranks #1 overall — ahead of Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch) at #20. Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch) is cheaper on input tokens at $0.05/1M vs $0.14/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch): which should you use?

Choose DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…

  • It sees more real traffic — #1 overall on OpenRouter's weekly ranking, against #20 for Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch).
  • It is the newer model — released Jul 2026 against Jul 2025.

Choose Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch) if…

  • Cheaper to read — $0.05 vs $0.14 per 1M input tokens, which is what dominates long-prompt and RAG workloads.
  • Cheaper to write — $0.20 vs $0.28 per 1M output tokens, the line item that decides generation-heavy costs.
  • It accepts image, file, audio, video input, which DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 does not.

Spec Comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch)
Authordeepseekgoogle
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.14$0.05
Output price (per 1M tokens)$0.28$0.20
Context window1M1M
Input modalitiestexttext, image, file, audio, video
Output modalitiestexttext
AA Intelligence51.8
AA Coding69.1
AA Agentic48.4
ReleasedJul 2026Jul 2025

What DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch) actually cost to run

On a read-heavy job — 1M tokens in, 100K out — DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.17 and Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch) costs $0.07.

Flip the shape — 100K in, 1M out — and it becomes $0.29 for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 versus $0.21 for Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch).

Both figures are the published per-token rates multiplied out; caching and batch discounts are not included.

Usage Rank by Task

About DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch)

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Built by deepseek · released Jul 2026 · 1M-token context

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is a sparse mixture-of-experts model from DeepSeek, with 13B active parameters out of 284B total. This re-post-trained revision is suited for coding, reasoning, and agent workflows....

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch)

Built by google · released Jul 2025 · 1M-token context

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a lightweight reasoning model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for ultra-low latency and cost efficiency. It offers improved throughput, faster token generation, and better performance...

Share this comparisonXReddit

Get notified when DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch) moves

Usage ranks and prices refresh weekly. We email you when they move — once a week, no spam.

FAQ

Which is better, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch)?

Based on weekly OpenRouter usage tracked by AI Tier List, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ranks #1 overall — ahead of Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch) at #20. Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch) is cheaper on input tokens at $0.05/1M vs $0.14/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch)?

Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch) is cheaper at $0.05 per 1M input tokens. Output pricing: DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 $0.28, Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite (batch) $0.20.

Usage ranks are weekly data aggregated by OpenRouter. Prices are USD per 1M tokens.